Riesgos del uso de plataformas externas en análisis forense digital

Risks of using external platforms in digital forensic analysis

April 29, 2025 Juan Antonio Calles

In today's world, email remains one of the main vectors of cybersecurity incidents: from corporate fraud and information leaks to ransomware attacks or insider threats. Forensic analysis of emails has therefore become an essential discipline to clarify incidents, identify responsibilities, and preserve evidence with probative value. However, during these investigations, practices may arise that, although they seem harmless or convenient, seriously compromise the integrity of the forensic process. This post is born precisely from that concern: to warn about one of the most common and dangerous mistakes still seen in some environments — the use of external web platforms to analyze emails — and to remind why, in digital forensic analysis, rigor is non-negotiable.

The growing proliferation of web platforms offering header analysis, email preview, or integrity validation services can be tempting for any professional facing a technical investigation. Many of them are free, accessible, and promise quick results. However, in the context of rigorous digital forensic analysis, their use poses an unacceptable risk that compromises not only the validity of the evidence but also the protection of the analyzed data.

From the moment digital evidence leaves the controlled environment and is introduced into an external platform, the chain of custody is broken. This break is not only a technical problem but legally invalidates the evidence, making its defense in a judicial process impossible. The expert or analyst loses the ability to prove that the data has not been altered, copied, exposed, or manipulated during its transit through third-party services.

Added to this is the serious problem of data protection. Most of these online services operate from the United States or third countries outside the European Economic Area, which constitutes a breach of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Uploading an email, even just to analyze its header, involves transferring personal or sensitive data outside the European guarantee framework, with potentially very serious legal and reputational consequences.

Services like WhatIsMyIP Email Header Analyzer, MXToolbox Email Headers or Google Messageheader Analyzer can be valid tools for internal or training processes, but their use in forensic or judicial environments is completely discouraged. In the case of a legal procedure, any defense based on evidence processed through these tools would lack credibility before a judge or opposing counsel.

Among the main risks involved in using these platforms, I would highlight the following:

Loss of control over evidence: it is impossible to know what treatment the data receives after being uploaded. Are they stored? Are they analyzed? Are they shared with third parties?
Breach of confidentiality: accidental exposure of confidential information can trigger legal sanctions, economic losses, and irreparable reputational damage.
Inadmissibility of evidence: in court, it is required to prove that the evidence has been preserved intact and controlled since its capture. Using external tools prevents meeting this basic requirement.
Exposure to foreign jurisdictions: legislations outside Europe allow third-party governments to access data under laws such as the USA Cloud Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act), violating the privacy of affected organizations and individuals.

The use of uncontrolled online tools therefore represents a direct attack on the principles governing forensic discipline: integrity, confidentiality, authenticity and traceability.

In serious investigations, the only valid approach is to use local, reliable, and auditable tools that ensure the proper custody and handling of evidence. Digital forensics does not allow shortcuts, and the temptation of speed must never compromise the robustness of an analysis whose defense can have legal, economic, and personal repercussions of great significance.

The recommendation, firm and unequivocal, is clear: in professional forensic analysis, never compromise the evidence by using uncontrolled external services.

return to blog